SEO for architecture firms, from portfolio to enquiry

Every provider below was read on its own page through our fetch box, and the row says what that page published on the day we read it. 8 of 27 publish a figure; the rest are listed too, because how many will not quote a number is the most useful thing about this market. Nothing here is a quote for your job: it is what other people advertise.

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2). 8 of the 27 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 19 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 2 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere. The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 233 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded. Derivation as chartered: one row per agency that publishes a fee: the shape (monthly retainer, fixed package, audit, hourly), the number, the minimum term, whether VAT is stated, what the tier buys (keyword count, locations, content pieces, reporting), and whether the number is architecture-specific or a general small-business band - and across the rows the figures nobody computes: the median and range of the published monthly retainer, the ARCHITECTURE PREMIUM (the gap between the sector-specific published band and the general small-business band), the PUBLISH RATE among agencies that claim the vertical, the London uplift, and repriced-since

“UK Architecture SEO Price Index”, SEO for architecture firm, https://seoarchitecturefirm.co.uk/ (updated 2026-11-02).