Seo for architecture firm cost (8 sources)

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through the estate's fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

8 of the 27 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 19 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 2 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 233 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

Derivation as chartered: one row per agency that publishes a fee: the shape (monthly retainer, fixed package, audit, hourly), the number, the minimum term, whether VAT is stated, what the tier buys (keyword count, locations, content pieces, reporting), and whether the number is architecture-specific or a general small-business band - and across the rows the figures nobody computes: the median and range of the published monthly retainer, the ARCHITECTURE PREMIUM (the gap between the sector-specific published band and the general small-business band), the PUBLISH RATE among agencies that claim the vertical, the London uplift, and repriced-since

233 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.